Jordan Michael Smith at PJ Media asks the question: Are Gay Republican Groups Gaining Momentum? In the wake of their defeat in the last election, many Republicans are musing that the party will have to adopt a more gay-friendly attitude to stay relevant to younger right-wing voters who are increasingly turning away from social conservatism. Smith writes:
Analysts, pollsters, and Republican insiders believe that the GOP will have to formulate more gay-friendly policies in order to attract a younger generation that is familiar and comfortable with homosexuals. “Young people today have never not known gay people,” says Jimmy LaSalvia, executive director of GOProud. While older Americans were taught to see gays as deviant and dangerous, few of their grandchildren feel the same way. “The older folks are quite literally dying off,” he said.
No less a figure than former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has agreed. “It is in every family. … It is in every community,” he said. “The momentum is clearly now in the direction in finding some way to … accommodate and deal with reality. And the reality is going to be that in a number of American states — and it will be more after 2014 — gay relationships will be legal, period.”
What made Gingrich’s acknowledgement remarkable was that he has a record of deep hostility to the gay community. In December, Gingrich told a gay man during a campaign that he should simply vote for President Barack Obama. “The effort to create alternatives to marriage between a man and a woman are perfectly natural pagan behaviors, but they are a fundamental violation of our civilization,” said Gingrich earlier in 2012.
And yet, Log Cabin and similar groups acknowledge that countering the strong social conservative wing of the Republican Party will not be easy. “Certainly it’s a vocal wing, but historically a big tent party,” says Greg Angelo, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans. “Republicans win when they emphasize the core ideas of the party: low taxes and strong defense, among other things. They lose with traditional social conservatism.” LaSalvia agrees: “Demonizing gays hurts us with everyone; we need to marginalize that small group of bigots that frankly does exist.”Some social conservatives disagree. Ryan Anderson of the Heritage Foundation counters:
“Regardless of what some might imagine, support for marriage isn’t a relic of the past,” wrote Ryan Anderson of the Heritage Foundation, in National Review. He gave numbers. In some cases, he pointed out, anti-gay marriage initiatives outdid Mitt Romney’s tally. In Washington state, Romney won 43 percent, marriage got 48 percent, for instance. “It suggests that we should redouble our efforts to re-educate a generation of heirs to the sexual revolution’s bitter fruits, who are deeply confused about the nature and social purpose of marriage.”As I have written before, I strongly disagree with Mr. Anderson that gay marriage will destroy the institution of marriage, but rather will extend the stabilizing and socially beneficial effects of marriage to a segment of society that badly needs it. Gay marriage will make gays more conservative, not make straight conservatives more liberal, and that's a good thing for the conservative movement. The GOP needs to embrace this change or risk becoming permanently irrelevant in US political life. The Conservative Party of Canada has learned that lesson, and society hasn't collapsed; in fact Canada is more politically conservative now than at any time in my memory. American conservatives could learn something from our experience.